![]() |
qua torva res esby scarlettandblue |
![]() |
Report 14
Day 60
Tsub1
To: Col F Simmons
From : Dr J McKenzie
Subject 1 continues to display behaviours within normal boundaries. Interaction with Civilians non critical at this time. Memory patch fully functional and embedded
Recommend continued surveillance. Monitoring of psychiatric sessions. Continued sampling to ensure brain chemistry remains at optimum levels once medication is reduced.
Review: 28 days.
Report 20
Day 80
Tsub2
To: Col F Simmons
From: Dr Lee
subject 2 remains unchanged.
All measurements and data within normal range for species. As previously stated there is nothing remarkable about this subject. And in light of this my recommendation remains unchanged. It is likely just a lost pet that was caught up in the retrieval. Release it to the civilian authorities to deal with.
Report 25 (Final)
Day 90
Tsub1
To: Col. F Simmons
From: Dr J Mckenzie
I have finished my evaluation of subject 1.
The memory patch has been in operation for 90 days. There has been zero bleed-through of suppressed memories. Sufficient time has passed to allow for any delayed reaction or breakdown. The patch is now fully integrated and fully operational. The subject has reached an optimal level of mental stability under the circumstances.
Despite repeated testing there are absolutely no signs of any adverse side-effects from the subject's exposure to the device.
The subject has re-integrated with the family with little emotional fallout, and while the situation is not ideal it is an acceptable compromise. l predict the subject may be mis-advised to seek alternative, less high value therapy, but this has no bearing on the classified issues that I was tasked with overseeing.
Any future involvement of other, possibly less qualified or skilled, mental health operatives will have no effect on the damage limitation procedures we have already incorporated into this subject.
My conclusion is the treatment has been a complete success and there is little value in my continued involvement with the subject.
Of course the subject will no longer be able to participate in the classified reaserch that he was engaged in prior to the incident. It is an unfortunate consequence of the invasive nature of the memory patch that some mental capacity and fortitude has been compromised. The subject may retain much of his high-functioning mental powers but his ability to withstand interrogation and his capacity to remain circumspect and unemotional has likely been damaged by the procedure.
Based on my findings and my professional judgement of the subject after our lengthy sessions, my recommendation would be continued employment of the subject on less sensitive areas of work. This would allow an optimal degree of control and supervision.
I would suggest an approach be made within the next two weeks as the subject seems to have recovered physically and is now mentally stable.
Alternatively I could recommend enforced retirement with a sufficiently generous severance package, provided we authorize a subtle campaign to discredit any future research or publishing that might compromise security. Something similar to the propaganda applied to Dr Jackson's unfortunate revelations should be sufficient. This is a viable alternative should it prove unsuitable to retain the subject in employment. This alternative would also pose minimal risk in my opinion.
Having observed the subject's current family situation I would strongly advise against authorizing a more permanent and final solution to the situation.
I feel the time when this might have been a viable option has passed and to attempt this kind of hard clean up now would pose a high level risk of exposure.
While the subject's family is neither prominent nor important, either politically or financially, I believe they poses a sufficient level of political and social awareness to ensure that were the subject to disappear now, there would be an unacceptable level of publicity. There would be little we could do to deter them, as action against citizens of an ally who are to all intents innocent non- combatants would undoubtedly be unacceptable to the present administration.
I will begin the process of closing my base of operations here unless I hear from you.
Addendum:
While I have not been involved in the research or testing of subject 2 it is my view that this second subject be disposed of. I no longer have any requirement to re-examine it, as subject 1 has been fully and successfully treated. We have undoubtedly collected all the meaningful data we can from the second subject, so there can be little point in keeping it alive. My recommendation is euthanize it and dispose of the body as an extreme contaminant, for the sake of caution.
![]() |
back to sga_santa |
![]() |